Sind Weblogs Monster? | Are Weblogs Monsters? - Part 21

posted by usha on 2006/04/07 20:45

[ Sind Weblogs Monster? | Are Weblogs Monsters? ]

"In online writing, little things mean a lot" - this is the headline of one Amy's recent entries in her Blog "Contentious" on Social Software, esp. Weblogs and women journalists/bloggers.

She gives a guideline for "microcontent" that sounds familiar to anyone who had to deal with writing theses, papers, essays. Amy is dealing with common requirements of informative texts: headlines, explanatory content, straight argumentation, the use of highlighting important microcontent, etc.

This would be even more important for web-based texts, since

  • Web users tend to scan pages, rather than read them.
  • A user can arrive at virtually any page in your site from just about anywhere on the web.
  • Web users tend to be impatient and fickle. If they can’t figure out a site or page in a few seconds, they’ll probably move on.
Though, Amy is certainly right about a special 'attention deficit' of Web users (information shall be gathered as fast as possible), academics are generally used to the habit of browsing through texts. Though, I know very well of the necessity of inserting "eye-catchers" and bundling information, though, there are times, I think that is too easy and that a text is a text with its value in itself and its language and rhetoric, and therefore any readers should take a chance to encounter the text and to enjoy its linguistic and rhetorical ramifications.

In sum, I really like the hints Amy is offering for this special kind of writing and presenting information. Yet, on the other hand, I think nothing is wrong with insisting on style that can be intricate, too.



You are welcome to participate in this blog. Please, post your comments and suggestions either by using the button "reply" at the bottom of each blog or send them to
> RSS Feed RSS 2.0 feed for Kakanien Revisited Blog Redaktion